Simon Kinberg Teases Returning Characters, Potential Re-Casting for X-Men: Apocalypse

https://i2.wp.com/cdn1-www.superherohype.com/assets/uploads/2014/09/x-men-apocalypse-header-6.jpg?w=584

Even before this year’s colossal hit X-Men: Days of Future Past debuted, 20th Century Fox was already making plans for a follow-up in the form of X-Men: Apocalypse. Since then, a few more details on the film have been revealed, including what mutants could pop up and who could return, but so far the majority of what we know is that it will focus primarily on the returning “First Class” characters.

Series writer and producer Simon Kinberg took part in a Q&A with Yahoo! recently in which he was asked about the upcoming film and whether we might see some of the other future mutants (Kitty Pryde, Bishop) return for future X-Men films.

“The X-Men film that we’re working on now as everybody knows is X-Men: Apocalypse and that really follows the stories of the let’s say ‘First Class’ X-Men. Jennifer Lawrence, Michael Fassbender, James McAvoy, Nicholas Hoult, many others of that generation of X-Men. So, in future X-Men films? Perhaps, but in ‘Apocalypse’ it will really be the continuation of the ‘past’ of ‘Days of Future Past.’”

Kinberg was also asked about recasting any of the original “X-Men” actors for the upcoming “Apocalypse,” to which he replied:

“If we included some of the original X-Men, like Storm, Jean, Scott, and others, yeah we would have to recast them, because Apocalypse takes place a good twenty years before “X1,” which now insanely was fifteen years ago. It would be very hard to do. Halle, Famke, and Jimmy, and others have done such wonderful jobs of bringing those characters to life and they’re so identified, those actors, with the parts now. So it would be a tall task, but I also would have said before “First Class” there would be no way we could find actors who could stand alongside Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart, and I think we managed to with Michael and James finding their own interpretation of the characters, not doing an impersonation. So, are we going to have to recast? If some of those characters were in the movie we would, but we’ll see.”

Despite being purposefully vague about whether or not these characters could appear in the film, Kinberg has already mentioned previously that some of the original characters will be present for the next movie. It could be argued that he was referencing Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine or perhaps Patrick Stewart’s Charles Xavier, but given director Bryan Singer was quoted as saying he wanted to introduce “familiar characters at different ages” in the film, it seems likely we’ll be seeing younger versions of the original cast.

Kinberg, along with X2: X-Men United writers Dan Harris and Michael Dougherty, is developing the screenplay for the film which Bryan Singer will return to once again direct. X-Men: Apocalypse is set for release on May 27, 2016.

Supergirl Is Going To Be Changed In These Specific Ways

https://i2.wp.com/www.cinemablend.com/images/sections/67478/supergirl_67478.jpg?w=584In the comics, the reason Supergirl is named Supergirl is because she was only a teenager when she met and trained with Superman to hone her special powers given to her by Earth’s yellow sun. Basically, her title is meant to be an indication of her young age (and, of course, to differentiate her from any characters named “Superwoman”).

This makes us wonder why the Supergirl that will be featured in the upcoming CBS series has that name, given that she will be aged up to be 24 when she first hones her powers.

This under-the-radar bit of info comes to us from The Hollywood Reporter’s story from a few days ago, when it was officially revealed that Supergirl has gotten a series commitment from CBS. In that write-up, the trade included a brief breakdown of the show’s plot, and in doing so revealed that there will be a slight but interesting change made to the titular character’s origin:

The hourlong drama… centers on Kara Zor-El, Superman’s cousin, who was born on the planet Krypton and escaped amid its destruction years ago. Since arriving on Earth, she has been hiding the powers she shares with her famous cousin. But now at age 24, she decides to embrace her superhuman abilities and be the hero she was always meant to be.

For comparison, going back to the original Supergirl’s debut in 1959, the character was introduced as one of the only survivor of Argo City, part of Krypton that managed to stay intact after the planet’s explosion and drifted through space as a result. When the inhabitants begin to die due to exposure to Green Kryptonite, the young Kara Zor-El is sent to Earth by her father, Zor-El, to be brought up by Superman. Living at an orphanage and adopting the name Linda Lee, she begins training with her mentor and by the time she starts attending high school she is allowed to start openly be a superhero.

So why exactly is this happening? Sure, making Supergirl 24-years-old puts her in the same range as Stephen Amell’s Arrow and Grant Gustin’s Flash, but wouldn’t some more age diversity be kind of a nice thing? And it can’t be a casting thing, because Hollywood has had actors in their 20s (and even 30s) playing teens for decades. The only reasonable explanation I can come up with is that the studio and showrunners Greg Berlanti and Ali Adler want to avoid comparisons to Smallville, but would that really be that hard to do on the creative end?

It will be interesting to see how this whole situation shakes out, but it may be a while before we get any answers, as we still don’t really know the full details of the timetable for the Supergirl series. Stay tuned for more details as they emerge.

Jeremy Renner Not Interested in a HAWKEYE Solo Movie

http://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/5422e88be4b0e4fb553f528a/1411573909193/jeremy-renner-not-interested-in-a-hawkeye-solo-movie?format=750w

We still haven’t seen a fully realized Hawkeye in the Marvel cinematic universe, but we’ve heard that he will have a much bigger role in Avengers: Age of Ultron. He originally had a part in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, but it was ultimately cut out. MTV recently sat down with Jeremy Renner and talked about the character. During the interview, he teased that he could show up in Captain America 3, and also said that he’s not really interested in seeing Hawkeye get his own solo film.

“I’m happy to be the ensemble. I’m not scratching or clawing to do a solo movie by any means. I think he’s a utility guy that can bounce around into other people’s universes a little bit, especially ‘Cap 3’. There’s whispers of that.”

I don’t think Hawkeye needs his own film. The closest thing to a solo movie that I think could work would be if he and Black Widow teamed up for some kind of mission. I’m just curious to see what they do with the character in Age of Ultron. Hopefully Whedon was able to turn him into a badass.

Avengers: Age of Ultron is set for release on May 1st, 2015, and Captain America 3 will come out on May 6th, 2016.

New STAR WARS Action Figure Series Starts with Darth Vader

http://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/5422cedee4b02e90f651de40/1411567331344/new-star-wars-action-figure-series-started-with-darth-vader?format=750w

The Japanese toymaker, Revoltech, has started a cool new line of Star Wars action figures. They’ve revealed the first figure that they’ll be releasing in the series, which is Darth Vader. It’s labeled as figure “#001,” which means there are more to come.

As you can see in the photo above, the awesome looking figures are also posable. Even Darth Vader’s cape has points of articulation! That’s definitely a unique feature that I don’t think I’ve seen in a toy before.

The figure will be released in December, and you can pre-order Vader here for $64.99.http://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/5422cf15e4b0b4622904d0e8/1411567382714/new-star-wars-action-figure-series-started-with-darth-vader2?format=750whttp://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/5422cef1e4b0053e95da74d2/1411567345511/new-star-wars-action-figure-series-started-with-darth-vader?format=750whttp://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/5422cf03e4b0053e95da753c/1411567363664/new-star-wars-action-figure-series-started-with-darth-vader1?format=750w

Stephen King Explains Why He Hates THE SHINING

https://i1.wp.com/static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/523cb1e7e4b097504acd02d4/1379709419445/stephen-king-explains-why-he-still-hates-stanley-kubricks-the-shining-header.jpg?resize=462%2C343

It’s no secret that Stephen King doesn’t like Stanley Kubrick‘s big screen adaptation of The Shining. Even 33 years after the film’s release nothing has changed. King still hates the film, and in a recent interview with the BBC, the master of horror explains why.

“[It’s] cold, I’m not a cold guy. I think one of the things people relate to in my books is this warmth, there’s a reaching out and saying to the reader, ‘I want you to be a part of this.’ With Kubrick’s The Shining I felt that it was very cold, very ‘We’re looking at these people, but they’re like ants in an anthill, aren’t they doing interesting things, these little insects.’

He didn’t really seem to care for Jack Nicholson‘s portrayal of Jack either:

“Jack Torrance in the movie, seems crazy from the jump. Jack Nicholson, I’d seen all his biker pictures in the ’50s and ’60s and I thought, he’s just channeling The Wild Angels here.”

King got The Wild Angels movie mixed up with Hells Angels on Wheels. It’s not big deal, I just wanted to point that out in case there was any confusion because Nicholson wasn’t in Wild Angels. King then went on to talk about how much he disliked Kubrick’s depiction of Wendy.

“Shelley Duvall as Wendy is really one of the most misogynistic characters ever put on film, she’s basically just there to scream and be stupid and that’s not the woman that I wrote about.”

I personally think Kubrick’s Shining is a freakin’ great horror film, and even though it was different from the book, I still thought it was amazing. I liked it just as much as the book, but in different ways. I can understand why King wouldn’t like it though, it was his baby, and Kubrick just did his own thing.

What do you think, does King makes some good points here?

Ridley Scott Gives Updates on BLADE RUNNER and PROMETHEUS Sequels

http://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/54230017e4b0b61107537f6a/1411579928301/ridley-scott-gives-update-on-blade-runner-and-prometheus-sequels?format=750w

Director Ridley Scott is currently preparing to direct his two big sci-fi fi sequels, Blade Runner 2 and Prometheus 2. While speaking to Yahoo about his upcoming movie, Exodus: Gods and Kings, he also offered an update on the other two projects.

The last we heard on Blade Runner 2 was that the director said the script was “damn good,” and that he would shoot the film when he’s done with The Martian. Here’s what he had to say in his most recent interview:

“It’s on the charts, can’t say when that would be yet, because of [Ford’s] thing with ‘Star Wars’. It’s a sequel – it’s what happens next. It’s quite surprisingly clever.”

I  would like to see another film,  lets see what happens. He went on to give a more detailed update on Prometheus 2 saying:

“Right now, as we speak, it’s being written. I’ve had 15 drafts evolving. I definitely want to do that again because I really enjoyed doing Prometheus.”

Well, that’s interesting. He’s had 15 drafts of the scripts so far… I’m not sure if that’s a good or bad thing. He went on to address the mixed reviews of Prometheus and the lack of recognizable monsters, saying:

“The beast is done. Cooked. I got lucky meeting Giger all those years ago. It’s very hard to repeat that. I just happen to be the one who forced it through because they said it’s obscene. They didn’t want to do it and I said, ‘I want to do it, it’s fantastic’. But after four (he has conveniently forgotten the ‘AvP’ movies), I think it wears out a little bit. There’s only so much snarling you can do. I think you’ve got to come back with something more interesting. And I think we’ve found the next step. I thought the Engineers were quite a good start.”

As for what audiences can expect to see in the sequel, he said:

“You’ll probably have to go with [Noomi Rapace’s Elizabeth Shaw] and [Michael Fassbender’s android David] without his head. Find out how he gets his head back on!”

I disliked prometheus.  Was not happy with the storyline  or the  plot or the ending!  I expected more  I know many were disappointed with it as well!  I hope they can fix alot of this in the new movie!

Watch: ‘Popeye’ Is Pipe-Less, Tattoo-Less in Sony Animation Test

Popeye1Sony has given audiences an early look at Genndy Tartakovsky’s “Popeye.”

CGI-animated test footage, which won’t appear in the film, shows a pipe-less, tattoo-less Popeye fighting Bluto to save his beloved Olive Oyl. The clip follows a behind-the-scenes video of Tartakovsky at work adapting “Popeye” for the bigscreen and discussing why he was “destined” to make the film.

The cast hasn’t been announced yet so Tartakovsky used temp voices for the test footage.

After starting his career in TV animation with “Dexter’s Laboratory” and “Samurai Jack,” Tartakovsky made his feature film directorial debut in 2012 with “Hotel Transylvania.” He’s also directing a sequel for the film (also from Sony Pictures Animation), which will bow on Sept. 25, 2015.

Meanwhile, “Popeye” hits theaters in 2016.

X-Men Spinoff ‘Deadpool’ to Hit Theaters Feb. 12, 2016

Deadpool Ryan Reynolds X-Men Origins WolverineThe talkative mercenary character, also known as Wade Wilson, was created by artist Rob Liefeld and writer Fabian Nicieza. He first appeared in print in 1991.

If Reynolds does reprise his role in the film it would mark his first superhero project since “Green Lantern,” which floundered at the box office in 2011.

On Thursday, Fox also took “Assassin’s Creed” out of its Aug. 7, 2015, slot and moved its “Fantastic Four” reboot into the date from June 19. The studio did not set a new date for “Assassin’s Creed,” based on a Ubisoft videogame and starring Michael Fassbender.
Additionally, the studio moved its young-adult drama “Paper Towns,” adapted from the John Green novel, from July 31, 2015, to June 19.

“Deadpool” is the fourth film to be set for the Feb. 12, 2016, date along with Lionsgate’s “Gods of Egypt,” Universal’s untitled animated pets project and Warner’s romantic comedy “How to Be Single.”

SUPERGIRL TV Series Lands at CBS

http://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/541c5a05e4b0d5fed943fc3c/1411144200653/supergirl-tv-series-lands-at-cbs?format=750w

That Supergirl TV series we’ve been hearing about that is being developed by Arrow‘s Greg Berlanti has landed at CBS. According to Deadline, the deal closed last night, which is only one day after the project was taken out to the broadcast networks. They must have put together an impressive package, but Supergirl really does have the makings of a successful show if done right.

The series will center on Kara Zor-El, Superman’s cousin, “who was born on the planet Krypton and escaped amid its destruction years ago. Since arriving on Earth, she has been hiding the powers she shares with her famous cousin. But now at age 24, she decides to embrace her superhuman abilities and be the hero she was always meant to be.”

The character was previously played by Laura Vandervoort on The CW’s Superman origin series Smallville. I’m happy to see that the new DC Comics series is moving forward, and I’m really curious to see how they bring the character to life in it.

Disney Casts Pete in PETE’S DRAGON Remake

http://static.squarespace.com/static/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/t/541ca78be4b000f167feb89c/1411164045051/disney-casts-pete-in-petes-dragon-remake?format=750w

It was announced last year that Disney would be remaking their classic live-action animated hybrid film, Pete’s Dragon. The production has taken a step forward today with the casting of a young actor named Oakes Fegley who will play Pete in the story. They’ve also cast Oona Laurence, who will play Pete’s friend.

David Lowery (Them Bodies Saints) is set to direct from a script he co-wrote with Toby Halbrooks. According to Variety, the story will be a reinvention of the 1977 film, and it will obviously revolve around Pete and his best friend Elliot, who happens to be a dragon. The first movie was also a musical, but this new film won’t include that musical aspect. With the technology we have today to bring these fantasy creatures to life, I’m curious to see what the design will look like for the dragon.

I haven’t watched Pete’s Dragon since I was a little kid. I can barely remember it, so maybe it’s time I sit down and watch it with the kids.

I was a fan i would like to see what can be done with this to upgrade it!